Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 2

Image Source:

Stephen Dedalus — Image Source:

This is a short episode, but there is a lot going on. For me, this episode sets the groundwork for the saga which will unfold throughout the book. Some of the dominant themes that stood out for me were memory, history, money, anti-Semitism, and misogyny.

Early in the episode, Stephen Dedalus’ mind wanders as he briefly considers memory. There is a sense that Stephen is haunted by memories, most likely the result of his pain over his mother’s death. I suspect that the reason for this is because often the most vivid memories are the sharpest and most painful, those which cut directly into the psyche.

Fabled by the daughters of memory. And yet it was in some way if not as memory fabled it. A phrase, then, of impatience, thud of Blake’s wings of excess. I hear the ruin of all space, shattered glass and toppling masonry, and time one livid final flame. What’s left us then?

(p. 24)

As Stephen is discussing Pyrrhus with the class he is teaching, one of the students jokes that Pyrrhus was a pier. Stephen then follows the prompt and explores what is a pier.

—Tell me now, Stephen said, poking the boy’s shoulder with the book, what is a pier.

—A pier, sir, Armstrong said. A thing out in the waves. A kind of bridge. Kingstown pier, sir.

(p. 24)

The pier then becomes a symbol for memory. It is something solid that juts out into the sea of the subconscious. And despite the continuous crashing of the waves of forgetfulness against the pylons holding up the pier, the pier remains, just as the painful memories persist. It is also worth noting that a pier is a place where ships depart and dock, so the pier also builds the connection to the seafaring Odysseus.

As the class is dismissing, Stephen offers the following riddle to the class:

The cock crew
The sky was blue:
The bells in heaven
Were striking eleven.
Tis time for this poor soul
To go to heaven.

(p. 26)

The students are unable to solve the riddle, so Stephen tells them that the answer is “The fox burying his grandmother under a hollybush.” (p. 27) This is a totally absurdist answer and has no relevance to the riddle whatsoever. I would go as far as asserting it is a Dadaist answer. I pondered the riddle for a bit and came up with my own answer: Judas Iscariot. There were originally twelve apostles, and one would assume that eleven of them were admitted into heaven, hence the ringing of the eleven bells. Judas was sent to hell, for betraying Christ and for committing suicide. The riddle implies that it is time to forgive Judas for his sins and allow his soul access to heaven. I think Joyce dropped a little hint to the riddle in the text, because on page 29, he mentions the twelve apostles.

The image of the fox reappears, but now it seems to be a symbol for a historian, a sly and intelligent creature who is obsessed with digging up the past, with scraping away the debris of time to uncover the history buried below the surface.

A poor soul gone to heaven: and on a heath beneath winking stars a fox, red reek of rapine in his fur, with merciless bright eyes scraped in the earth, listened, scraped up the earth, listened, scraped and scraped.

(p. 28)

The second half of this episode focuses on Stephen’s interactions with Mr. Deasy, the schoolmaster. I personally found Deasy to be a most disdainful character and he could easily be called Mr. Queasy, since he kind of made me feel sick. He is self-righteous, obsessed with money, brazenly anti-Semitic, and misogynistic.

Deasy lectures Stephen on the importance of money, emphasizing that money is power. He then tosses in a quote by Shakespeare to back up his assertion, but Stephen catches the irony of the fact that it was Iago who Deasy quoted, and Iago is not a model character.

—Because you don’t save, Mr Deasy said, pointing his finger. You don’t know what money is. Money is power, when you have lived as long as I have. I know, I know. If youth but knew. But what does Shakespeare say? Put but money in thy purse.

—Iago, Stephen murmured.

(p. 30)

Shortly afterward, Deasy launches into an anti-Semitic rant. He employs the same inane arguments that have fueled anti-Jewish sentiment for years: that the Jews control the government, the banks, the press, and so forth. He then accuses the Jews of being the cause of society’s decline.

—Mark my words, Mr Dedalus, he said. England is in the hands of the jews. In all the highest places: her finance, her press. And they are the signs of a nation’s decay. Wherever they gather they eat up the nation’s vital strength. I have seen it coming these years. As sure as we are standing here the jew merchants are already at their work of destruction. Old England is dying.

(p. 33)

After Stephen attempts to defend the Jews against Deasy’s accusations, he says something that really struck a nerve with me:

—History, Stephen said, is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.

(p. 34)

On one level, this is an expression of the connection between memory and history. Stephen’s past haunts and torments him, and try as he may, he cannot free himself from his personal history. But there is also a larger issue here. Our society is formed based upon human history. Whether we remember the past or forget it collectively, it doesn’t matter all that much. We are still the products of our collective past. If you wanted to apply a Jungian analysis, you could also argue that our collective consciousness is tied to our collective history, and we are bound to it, unable to free ourselves. It’s kind of a dark rabbit hole to start going down, and for one who has always viewed history in a positive light, this casts a shroud over my long-standing views on the value of history and memory.

Next, Deasy launches into his tirade against women. During his rant, he mentions Helen of Troy, which serves to tie the scene in with the Homeric motif.

—I am happier than you are, he said. We have committed many errors and many sins. A woman brought sin into the world. For a woman who was no better than she should be, Helen, the runaway wife of Menelaus, ten years the Greeks make war on troy. A faithless wife first brought strangers to our shore here. MacMurrough’s wife and her leman O’Rourke, prince of Breffini. A woman too brought Parnell low. Many errors, many failures but not one sin. I am a struggler now at the end of my days. But I will fight for the right till the end.

(pp. 34 – 35)

As I read this again, I couldn’t help wondering how Stephen felt hearing this, especially with the pain of his mother’s death still fresh. He does not react to it, other than signaling he is ready to leave. I suspect he is hurt and angry, but because he is financially broke and struggling, and needs the work, he is afraid to speak out. I feel for Stephen. He is in a terrible place.

The episode concludes with Deasy making a joke about the Jews.

—I just wanted to say, he said. Ireland, they say, has the honour of being the only country which never persecuted the jews. Do you know that? No. And do you know why?

He frowned sternly on the bright air.

—Why, sir? Stephen asked, beginning to smile.

—Because she never let them in, Mr Deasy said solemnly.

A coughball of laughter leaped from his throat dragging after it a rattling chain of phlegm. He turned back quickly, coughing, laughing, his lifted arms waving to the air.

(p. 36)

For me, this is the key setup for what is to come. There is a similarity between the Jews wandering in the desert and Odysseus traveling the seas. Both are wanderers attempting to return home, but can’t. It is also important to note that Leopold Bloom (who correlates to Odysseus and will appear soon in the story) is Jewish.

The next episode concludes the first part of the book. If you are reading along, I expect to have my thoughts on Episode 3 to be up in about a week. Read on!


Filed under Literature

22 responses to “Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 2

  1. I was struck by your comment that painful memories are the most vivid. This is certainly true for me, and I especially like the way you connect memory to the image of the pier jutting out into the sea of the subconscious. So much richness here to ponder!

    I also appreciate your proposed solution to the riddle (which I quickly gave up on). Judas makes so much sense. Also like your idea of the fox as a historian digging and the way you relate the history/nightmare quote to Stephan’s personal history, which really resonated with me in the light of feeling imprisoned by painful memories. I’m not sure that Joyce intended it as a condemnation of history, though; I think it’s more of a two-edged sword, and certainly the references to literature of the past (Hamlet, The Odyssey) would suggest that Joyce appreciates the value of literary history at least.

    Thanks so much for the thoughtful insights. I’m also very glad you’re taking it at a slow pace! I think I can handle one episode per week.

    By the way, do you know about “Ulysses Annotated” by Don Gifford? It’s pretty much what it says, a companion volume that explicates Joyce’s references. On the other hand, reading it before you’ve thought about each episode might impair your own interpretations and thoughts. Still, a handy reference.

    • Thanks for your thoughtful comment, Nancy!! I’m inclined to agree with you about history being a double-edged sword, but it seems that Stephen is haunted by his personal history, at least in its association to memory. Regarding the Gifford book, I used it when I studied Ulysses in college, and yes, it is an amazing wealth of information on the text. But for this time, I made the conscious decision not to refer to the annotation and instead allow for my own interpretations. I hope you continue to read along and share your comments. You always have wonderful insights. Cheers!!

  2. The pier image is perfect to express something fundamental in us. For most of my life I’ve revisited Huntington Beach pier in my dreams. I had a sense it had to do with just this effort to extend conscious awareness further into the subconscious.
    Check out Mondrian pier paintings.

  3. Brilliant, fascinating post. I still need to finish reading this part but I love what you say about the Jews. The Wandering Jew archetype is really connected with Odysseus. About history being a nightmare, it is exactly what Odysseus had to do: go behind the veil of our finite historical world and peer into the archetypal infinity. History is like a dream, reality is something deeper and different.

    • Hi Monika. I’m glad you liked the post. I love what you say about reality being deeper and different than history. History is kind of a construct, but then again, everything that we deem as reality is a construct of our perception.

      I am loving these discussions. Thank you so much for participating and sharing your insights!

  4. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 3 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  5. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 4 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  6. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 5 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  7. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 6 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  8. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 7 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  9. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 8 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  10. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 9 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  11. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 10 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  12. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 11 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  13. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 12 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  14. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 13 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  15. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 14 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  16. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 15 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  17. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 16 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  18. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 17 | Stuff Jeff Reads

  19. Pingback: Joyce’s “Ulysses” – Episode 18 | Stuff Jeff Reads